The
capacity and influence of London’s markets in the early sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries was primarily dictated by the irrefutable advantages of
establishing a flourishing system of commerce that exploited England’s
burgeoning status as a profiteer in international trade. Substituting the
traditional, yet archaic guild system, the advent of trade companies and
modernized monetary practices, prompted the large scale economic growth that
would eventually fulfill England’s ambition to ascertain a worldwide empire.
The
decline of the guild system is primarily attributed to the widening divisions
between entrepreneurs and skilled artisans and the commercial and industrial
capitalists. As England’s investments in international trade improved, the
jurisdictions of the various guilds became compromised by the reallocation of
monetary and municipal boundaries that had previously been irresolute.<Fisher> As the
marketplace shifted to accommodate the growing demands for worldwide commercial
trade, expansive conglomerates referred to as trade companies, became the
primary executors of London’s economic dealings around the world. England’s
initial forays into international trade have been recorded as a trial and error
process in which the outcome was often times negative. London’s rural producers
were skeptical of corporations and their definite influence over England’s
emergent economy. In order to appease corporate investors and localized traders
a compromise was formatted to effectively identify two fundamental principles
that satisfied all competing economic interests: monopolies and chartered
companies. <Fisher>
Whereas
monopolies effectively granted exclusive trading rights on certain exported
goods and materials, chartered companies were the primary institution
responsible for expanding London’s economic boundaries. Chartered companies
represented the interests of not only merchants, but also the wealthy investors
who funded expeditions with eventual aspirations of exploiting new sources of
raw materials and potential trading partners. The Folger online exhibition
asserts that “Incorporations bestowed a charter and a legal personality. Cities
and craft and trade companies were alike corporate bodies with legal standing-
and all depended on the royal prerogative.” < Folger> In accordance to
England’s ventures in international trade, a few prominent companies were
rewarded royal charters and were financed directly by the king or queen. King
James and King Charles are notable for liberally extending royal support to
various trading companies looking to market their goods outside of London’s
immediate boarders.
Once
England had successfully established itself as a competitor in international commerce
the question then became how to effectively market the exotic goods that were
being acquired as a result of monopolies and chartered companies. In 1569 Sir
Thomas Gresham convinced the city to purchase land and personally funded the
construction of the Royal Exchange. Designed to accommodate both the private and
public economic interests of the city, the Royal Exchange constituted a
commercial hub in which London consumers invested in domestic and foreign
merchandise. By collaborating with the Dutch, England’s chief trading partner,
the Royal Exchange was perhaps most successful in alleviating the trepidations
that existed between traditional economic practices and England’s advancement
in international trade. <Folger>
No comments:
Post a Comment